Need TO Change World Opinion

Well no one can deny the power of strong Imagery .

.. Apparently pursuing the vision of A backwards far right neoconservative America isn't so good for real estate demand..


it seems the rest of world is trying to cash the American check


we are currently dealing with the result of spoiling the thermometer to spare to the child


In fact I'm convinced that the DOW was just a thermometer for the overall economy (Main Street)

But take solace and Thank God

no matter how bad America behaves or has behaved the world doesn't blame or hate African Americans for it .Ask a Black person that's well traveled ... they(the rest of the world) relate to African Americans because they too have felt helplessly swept up in and by the insensitive and arrogant pursuits for American interests perpetrated by a typical type of emotionally obtuse American Monarch



oh and careful that you don't blame a few American mortgage holders for what may turn out to be a World Wide issue

Eployment: Employment Raping your Economy

keeping relationships symbiotic

fun facts : the American economy is 65% -75% consumer spending
the basis for most American's spending power : Employment

AS humans we will continue bad relationships just because they are historic ..the persevering legacy of misery

Even today reading this you may have bad relationships with your church your employer your diet all because of the habitual nature of mankind?

communities have a right to decide who will provide them with services and goods
in a healthy economy supported by symbiotic business relationships ..customers are Employees with employment options .. they can get another job if they lose or move on from their current one.. but if all the new growing and profitable companies are not alleviating the employment pressure in the markets they rape simply because they don't have any urgent need for a new worker is NOT good enough reason to me to you and to your elected representatives to allow that business to continue to do business in that market ... that business is having a predatory relationship with their market their consumer and their own industry ..


some companies may believe that providing a service or good efficiently and cheaply is enough and they have no obligation to support this "Employment Market"

my response: well then sell it in Venezuela
don't push the world toward communism with a picture of poverty to match the rumour

retain the benefits of free market economics while reducing the hazards

even the greatest ideas don't amount to much dollars and cents in Afghanistan or Chechnya

try selling jet pack there




companies are more than welcome to sell services and goods in other poorer vicinities more available and communities for less without hiring .. supporting the consumer or locale "Employment Market"..

as it stands CEOs have little impetus to hire workers for the sake of supporting reinforcing the local market wherein they participate
you can thank your governments for that and their busy trying to keep share holders happy and play the earnings hopscotch

but if they were little forward thinking they could see that it does really affect them and that they actually have tremendous incentive to reinforce the capitalist culture of spending that requires a healthy employment market ..

Consumers can't continue to purchase your goods and services if you participate in limiting their employment options by not hiring workers congruent to your profits wherein

your are saying FU customers

when companies make large profits without assisting in decreasing unemployment pressure they are Raping Your Economy they are vacuuming wealth away from their very own customers because now those same customers that purchase and support the profitable companies product or commodity don't have the option of working for the company that is taking their money when or if their current employment relationship evaporates

what if employers or profitable businesses don't need people?

they need people if the want to work or conduct a healthy growing business in a healthy growing market


How can government or the people tell companies what to do in a free market economy?..
free market principles are great particularly Incentives and Innovations benefits of competition but they should not be licsence for companies to run rough shod over the basic principles of equity give and take quid pro quo the golden rule.. basic human principles which supersede acute free market traditions


How can we use the law to correct this relationship?

to me the precedent is trust Busting Teddy Roosevelt.. Companies should prefer to be nudged into hiring more workers than broken apart which we have done for the public good.


i stepped on a vulture on the corner the other day and he laughed said that "the us unemployment rate was so low because the prison rate was so high."

i thought has the government also developed a predatory relationship with the people

$chool'$ expen$ive CON$ideration$

I've been living on my own in New York City since I was 15 years old
Yep paying rent and tuition those years too . I gladly paid tuition for the advantages that my private school offered over NYC public schools. Particularly the facilities were more than most could ask for in such a crowded city .


But I've never made a lot of annual income and yet I've never qualified for financial aid for college. ( i guess i should have had some dependants when I was 16

Now I can't get loan to cover my classes at a relatively inexpensive private college (1750 per course.) . It will only cover up to 3700$. So I'm forced to go part time even though I'm ready for the full time workload. I'm forced to slowly go to school.

Now my father was invited to attend college for free as were many others from his generation .. Yet back then 60's and 70's College was still more of a choice an option ..

Now their generation (I toss blame like nerf balls) has left us with an economy where you now need a PHD To flip burgers (you have to go)

and (you have to pay for it)

fafsa is just a tedious mandatory procedure I have to go through every semester only to be rejected for any financial assistance because I'm capable of paying ?

I've never received tuition reimbursement although I've tried at every company (magnates in foreign countries) there's always some reason why I can't get it that year and begging is against my religion



- thank the master proponents of the ---trickle down vacuum up jobless economy--



most working class poor independent students in America are taking out loans now these loans are increasingly being handled by private financial institutions.

yet I hear the economic numbers are great .DOW's at 13000

But I heard from several unrelated people that there was nearly a riot when New Yorkers went to apply for a handful of entry level positions starting at 9.$ bucks and hour at the MnM store in midtown - true story

Did that make your business report.?

but its important almost as important as President Reagan's observation about the Russians not having many cars per family yet tooting the strength of their economy .. i read about that in gradeschool and realized
reported numbers can have little to do with realities

but the Dow just broke 13000 HURRAY!!!

I'm gonna have a DOW POW WOW party and you're all invited (all?hmm)

I am an Economics major and of course they don't emphasize this in class but what I am learning about is all the accommodations and considerations the government the IRS make for large businesses. To me the only reason why accounting is so complicated to normal folks is because they don't want to tell you how much they earned over how much they spent so they send you on a dizzying Odyssey of numbers, abbreviations, excuses and exceptions.. assets are included in revenue..appreciate or depreciate

needlessly complicated or very necessary ?

I know all about the double taxation that business possibly face . .. I just don't care because employees feel that too. I don't think any one from the government made any consideration about the depreciation of my jackets and cars or the relative/malleable ways I may report my earnings.. they don't ask how much rent/mortgage/taxes I have to pay living on my own or the mandatory travel expense /tax imposed on all new yorkers who have to take the train. The monthly pass is nearly 80$
In fact when applying for financial aid they don't even consider how someone can live in NYC and make estimate. $25,000 a year pay rent travel food and pay $24,000 a year in tuition.

Yet we have to go to school now thanks to economic policies that were formulated when I was in grade school ..How can anyone expect students particularly independent students to manage the cost of schools they have to attend (I thought Glasgow in concert by now) because of the economic outlook they had very little influence in shaping?

(make the baby boomers pay!- I sure know how to make enemies :)

WHY force American scholastic achievers to take out a loan for a service they clearly can't afford and won't be able to if their going for the wrong/noble burger flipping degree.

Does anyone make any considerations for those who really need it.?

I will
I will consider you
I will accommodate you ..
I would like to live vicariously through your accommodation.


screw it ill just pretend I'm Exxon- they get plenty of consideration and as a reward for craftily taking more from America than they're willing to give in service or jobs. (They remind me of poor ole GM-oblivious and blatant- check the policy makers). How about Haliburton which has finally decided to pick up and vacuum American Employees money from from a foreign location. (hey blatant Hali sugar daddy war bucks best buddy don't bother to employ more people in the country where you make most of your profits and consideratons.. leave it to Toyota and other foreign companies to do that)


so my revolutionary economic principle-- I've never heard espoused on TV or in class or by any politician in school or film


MY Explicit Simple Plan: Companies should not be prohibited from firing employees. However very profitable companies should be encouraged to hire more workers in proportion to their profitability .Practical application of social responsibility .(trying to prevent companies from firing workers is not working in France and that dynamic stifles employees incentive. )


Ever deal with a service worker like the DMV or the passport office where they are under no pressure to perform well.. it 's like you become the service worker.

So fire them at will but when I hear that a company is the most profitable I also want to hear how their hiring practices contribute to the economy they are Taking money from (feel free to do business in Venezeula or Zimbabwe (I got whole page on you coming Chavezeula)..we don't like being economically raped in America).. Because this is consumer driven economy .. not business not government .. and yet business and government are working together to eliminate the consumer and the consumer's purchasing power. ..


here's a rule in economic I have not learned in school


EMPLOYEES PURCHASE SERVICES, COMMODITIES AND GOODS- without employees every business suffers. From Exxon Fox News to the Gap to Ben and Jerry's .. the first to suffer are the commodities/services you don't really need.

GreedyMan You Hurt Society. People need expendable income to pursue interests that benefit society overall. New ideas and innovation are borne out of the luxury of time and perhaps expendable money to manifest great ideas

Could the Wright Brothers take to the air if they had to toil the fields? If they had to toil to get food for the next toiling we have to unleash this potential by spreading the wealth around enough to perpetuate more wealth for society overall via innovation.

The CEO's back then were getting that plane together?


This is why ideas and content have to be protected and credited correctly. because some people with good ideas have many many more in store. They naturally shelve the ones that are great the ones that can save society once they see they cant even win credit for their contribution.

you cannibalize your potential profitability by supporting a economic principle that does not encourage the creation of jobs in large profitable companies


NO Employees=NO Consumers --i know its not as complicated as depreciation but i hope you can appreciate it's simplicity


If 10000 people who want and can afford a flat screen tv .. there will be 10,000 purchases that will support jobs and the flat screen tv industry ..
but gazillion billionaire with a BUSH tax break is still only going to want ten or twelve TV's to have around the house. The flat screen TV industry suffers.. so everyone should rally behind the explicit principle of job creation.



so fire employees who don't meet standards but try to replace that headcount. Because the overall economy diminishes and the revenue relegator will eventually knock on the door of your business/firm

very profitable companies should be encouraged to hire more workers in proportion to their profitability. If only to contribute to the dynamic that makes it good to do business in America .
Millions of Employees with some expendable income ...(don't like it ...feel free to do business in Chavezuela)